By now I
cannot remember if when we began to walk around downtown Singapore it was
already nighttime or if it was only close to it, but soon enough the Sun fell
and we were moving through a cloudy metropolis with a foggy moon in the sky.
Eventually we made our way to a place that I believe was called the Singapore
river; beautiful display of lights reflected on the water. Somehow we began to
twist and turn between bridges and grass patches. We saw a rehearsal for a
children’s performance on the right, and then turned left and found a plaza
where people seemed to be setting up for a big event. An art event, completely
unrelated to what we were about to do and that we would not see because we were
leaving the next evening. Behind the plaza stood the Victoria Theatre. On the
left side there was an entrance and a small lobby, cramped with all the people
about to watch the show. Somebody gave me a ticket, I lined up, and just like
that I was inside. The stage was large, the theater was large; it had two
balconies. Somehow we were lucky enough to sit really close to the front, and
there we sat and waited in the pre-show noise that is always present before a
play. Eventually a screen began to scroll down and most of the theater went
silent.
The
projector turned on and began to project images of theaters. Just empty
theaters, in what was perhaps the strangest, most interesting moment of the
play. The screen was large and images ranged from giant, 2000+ seat theaters
with a large red curtain all the way to a bunch of chairs lined up in a patch
of grass. The moment was not completely silent; some people in the audience
kept talking and laughing, loudly enough for everyone to hear. And some people
were hushing and swearing at them, the former loudly enough for us to hear, the
latter whispered enough to be polite. The sequence of images felt eternal. It
gave you time to think. What are they trying to say? “This is theater”? “You
are now about to see a play”? “Whoops! We need a bit more time, so here’s a
video to entertain you”? Whatever it was, most people in that performance will
probably never be sure of the answer. But soon enough the projector was shut
off, the screen came up and curtain pulled aside to reveal a deep, barren
stage.
An Asian
girl, with glasses and a ponytail, no older than 16, came and lay down on
down-stage-right a sign that had the word “Ballet” written with marker on it. A
classical music piece began to play and she went to the middle of the stage,
made a turn that one would expect to see in ballet towards one side, made the
same exact turn towards the other side, and then walked off stage through stage
left. What followed was a series of people doing the same type of ballet turn,
one by one, until the entire cast had done so. Some people were really good and
could do three turns in one go; some could barely manage a single turn. The
cast presented was also very varied: variations of all ages, from children
bellow the age of 10 to middle-aged people; there was a fat drag queen, a black
man, a woman on a wheelchair, an Indian girl, a ballet dancer guy, a girl in a
figure-skating costume, a guy who seemingly had Down Syndrome, and whole lot of
other people, all of them dressed in shiny, interesting, costumes that allowed
for mobility. If I had to guess they were around 20. And if I had to guess,
they were mostly Singapore nationals. In fact, I knew from before that these
were supposedly mostly amateur performers, so I was not expecting anything too
big. Watching everyone slowly do a ballet turn was tedious, but bearable. And
the audience helped, because every time an interesting character came onstage
they had some hearable reaction that added variety to the show. Eventually they all began to come from behind
and they would run and do a leap with their arms out, as one seemingly does in
ballet, while running to the other corner of the stage through which they had
originally walked in through. Then after everyone had done that, somebody
finally stood behind the sign, and flipped the next sheet of paper onto it. And
then it said “Waltz.”
What
followed was basically the same plan of what had happened in “Ballet” but with
various different themes. In “Waltz,” they came in by pairs and waltzed to a
different piece of classical music - one that you’ve heard a hundred times in
all those corny movies – and then left the stage for the next pair to come,
until they had all gone.
Somebody
else stood by the sign and flipped the page and now it said “Silent Improv.”
Everyone came on stage at the same time and started doing stuff. It was weird.
One man kept stomping the floor at a constant beat, and at one point the drag
queen began to shout. It was weird, but interesting.
They all
left and flipped the sign and now it said Michael Jackson, and, of course,
Billie Jean started to play. Back to the “Ballet” format, each one moonwalked
from one side to the stage to the opposite one. Some were great, some just
walked backwards. The drag queen almost crashed into this lady. That was funny.
The drag queen was really funny, he had her mouth open in a very goofy way all
the time and had a butterfly make-up in her face.
After that
they flipped the sign and it said “bow.” They each came and bowed. Each taking
their own time. Somehow, it seemed that the people who were better at dancing were
not that good at bowing. But somehow, everyone had a different bow. It was
interesting, but honestly, tedious and long, because everyone bowed twice and
some people just took their damn time. Still, quite interesting. And the
audience clapped for every bow. Good job to the audience for keeping the energy
up and the positive vibe.
After
everyone bowed, a woman flipped to the next sheet and it said “Solo.” Some
strange, music began to play and she began to do a strange dance to it. It was
nothing magnificent or physically demanding, but slow and simply strange. The
woman danced the whole song, and while we expected the next person to show up
and go through all the cast doing their solos, the same woman came out again,
flipped the page, and now the chart said “Company Company.” Suddenly the entire
cast came out from stage-left, but their costumes were now a mess. One could
see that their costumes had actually been interchanged with each other, and
none of them were still wearing anything they had worn before (except probably
their underwear). Suddenly the same music began to play and the woman stood at
the front of the group and started to do the same dance, while everyone else
followed, or rather, attempted to follow her movements from behind. It was fun to
watch. The audience cheered after this, and each one of the performances that
followed. The cheering grew more vigorous with every performance.
After that
the order of the performances gets a bit messed up in the memory, but they were
the following:
The ballet
dancer was actually the second one, and his performance was absolutely amazing.
One could truly see the professionalism, beyond the posture and the figure.
Everyone else clumsily followed while the audience cheered and awed.
When the
lady in the wheelchair came to the front the crowd immediately began to cheer.
Then a really happy song that you could picture playing in a kid’s birthday
party began to play and she danced really playfully and confidently. Everyone
followed with their hands, and with their feet when she used wheels.
The black
man danced while some ethnic South Asian music began to sound. The guy popped
his eyes out, stuck his head out, and stood in a position which I would later
realize is the same as the one Balinese dancers take when doing dances such as
the Topeng dance. Once again everyone followed.
The drag
queen did a solo, very flamboyant, to one of those nameless female pop-singer
songs that give an air of “you go girl!” Just imagine a fat man dancing in the
girliest way possible. It was a sight to behold, and the guy clearly was
enjoying it.
One of the
two little boys (the eldest, by appearance at least) danced to Uptown Funk. It
was a bit of an odd dance, with more running around the stage than anything,
but it seemed really fun, with all the cast coming out from under the curtain
behind the stage and running from left to right.
One of the
women in the cast came out with a tray with a bunch of those pink ribbons that
you see in the gymnastic events of the Olympics. Half the cast grabbed one and
the other half walked off stage. Then the woman took a blue ribbon and they all
lay sitting gracefully (or at least she was) on the ground. The “Shut up and
dance” began to sound and the light blue ribbon began a mesmerizing dance all
over the stage, while a hilarious cacophony of pink ribbons tried to keep up at
the back. She was amazing. The song ended, and the other half of the cast came
out, took the ribbons, and they did the whole thing again. Nobody was
complaining. Everyone was cheering. Amazing performance.
At one
point, the guy with Down Syndrome stood at the front with a hand in his back,
and the audience was cheering for him. A classical piece of music began to sing
and everyone realized that it was in fact a European middle-aged man’s turn.
The black guy patted Down Syndrome on the shoulder and the performance carried
on. A hilarious “contemporary dance” performance ensued, that involved a lot of
motion in the space.
Down
Syndrome’s performance was right after that, and some cheery music with a
Latino vibe began to play. I thought I could see in his eyes that he was about
to cry, but he did a great job of keeping it together and delivering an
excellent performance.
By the time
the final performance came around the audience’s energy had crescendoed into a
party of emotions. We were laughing, crying, clapping, and when the man stood
at the front he began snapping his fingers and New York New York began to play
everyone was happy. It was an amazing performance and they actually shut down
the music and sang “Singapore Singapore” when it was supposed to be “New York
New York” and then they all lined up and did the kicking typical to that song
and then everyone was happy and then it ended and then everyone clapped and
then the curtain came down and just like that, it was over.
The curtain
went back up, they bowed, we clapped, and we got up, and left into the night,
with Dionysian energy binding us to happiness.
It is interesting how you describe how you felt about the small events happening on stage. You use the word “weird” and “strange,” but what how exactly did you feel, was it more of discomfort? Apathy? Curiosity? At the same time, you name certain events on stage “excellent” or “amazing” especially when you were able to see that the dancer had a professional dancing background, or you mention how your expectations were low when you knew the performers were amateurs. Does this mean your judgment on the performers were based on technique and professionalism? Then what about when you talk about how the audience needs no knowledge to gain a visceral impact on yourself in your “Why Gala?” post? Do you think the audience subconsciously sets standards of “good” and “bad” performances based on the technical knowledge they have?
ReplyDeleteDear Carlos,
ReplyDeleteYou begin this essay with a beautiful description of the atmosphere, locating the reader in a time and place. We are in Singapore, in the gorgeous downtown area, at night, walking to the Victoria Theater. The beginning has some of the qualities N'gugi wa Thiong'o demands in Globalectics, but not quite. What is not marked in your description is that the theater is named after Queen Victoria, monarch of Singapore's colonizers, and the vernacular of the architecture reflect that fact. But the theater is also refurbished and the glass box inserted into the second floor shows Singapore as a post-modern state, one that has not rid itself of its colonial past but which is very much a part of the scene of late stage capital. I am pushing you to write historically and materially because you come close. When you describe what most intrigued you about the show, you gave much attention to opening, the slideshow. The 8 minutes of silence, reminiscent of John Cages 4'33" (look it up if you don't know it) shifts the attention between the range of theaters, their architecture in relation to the place the occupy, and who in the audience knows how to behave properly. Both the building and those who occupy it become the spectacle. You seem to get that this is theoria - an active contemplation, for you write, "The sequence of images felt eternal. It gave you time to think. What are they trying to say? “This is theater”? “You are now about to see a play”? “Whoops! We need a bit more time, so here’s a video to entertain you”? Whatever it was, most people in that performance will probably never be sure of the answer." And then you give a marvelous description of the show, its order, the kinds of feeling and visual sights it conveys. But again I want to push back on how you choose your adjectives and adverbs, because Gala makes you contemplate those identifiers. You confidently described one dancer by his neuodivergence (which you and others of us believed you could read through a combination of visual characteristics and his behavior). The Balinese dancer is noted in your essay by the color of his skin -- but then another performer is just identified by her gender - "woman." The ballet dancer is not identified by skin color but by ability. These identifications set up a hierarchy - for they are not socially equivalent. And they are also easy identifiers. I notice that it was much rarer that you described someone by a kind of signature dance move or really gave detail of how they move. I am not disputing that you wrote an excellent description. But now I am challenging you to think even harder about the choices you make when you describe -- just as Gala asks you to do the same.