2pm Sunday, November 14, 2016.
If you read Atoka’s blog you know the
story.
If you haven’t then go read that (https://wp.nyu.edu/atokajothinkingtheater/), there’s
no point in repeating what’s already been said.
One thing I would like to add, is that we
do acknowledge that the “official” performances typically take place in the
Arts Center or right outside the Arts Center, but as Atoka has already said,
there were no public official performances that we could have noticed at the
time we walked around the campus.

Now as for the two paragraphs about my
contribution (Atoka was amazing at saying things that I did, but nonetheless):
While making observations on campus, I
think my main contribution had to do with coming up with potential definitions
for performance. Thanks to a meeting I had had with professor Debra Levine the
previous week, I had already considered some ideas for defining this term. One
of them can be found in Richard Schechner’s “Performance Studies An
introduction.” He says: “’doing’ is the activity of all that exists […]. ‘Showing
doing’ is performing: pointing to, underlining, and displaying doing.” (page
28) I felt a little hesitant while sharing the definition, because in a sense
it’s an unfair advantage that I casually happened to have… or perhaps it is a
disadvantage to not be able to frame one’s own definition out of nowhere.
Regardless, when I told Atoka about the definition, I said something like “It’s
to bring attention to action” and Atoka misunderstood the word “attention” for “tension,”
which is how another definition came about, which Atoka wrote as “Action with
tension,” where the tension is simply energy consciously put into doing the
action. By this rule, we discarded the possibility of something as banal as
walking (unless one walks in a particular way to draw attention) as being a
performance. Lastly, the definition that Atoka mentions as “Debra Levine’s
definition” was something that she loosely stated while I met with her: that “all
expressive behavior is performance.”
When marking important locations in Abu Dhabi,
what I mostly provided was my knowledge of the city’s layout, having lived here
for 4 years. I pointed out the where the National Theater (the one near Abu
Dhabi media) is and how close it is to the Ministry of Culture and Knowledge
development and how there is a branch annex to the theater itself. I also
mentioned how the Abu Dhabi Education Council (ADEC) lies between the center of
the city (what is often called the “Hamdan street area”) and the Khalifa City
area, which allows it to be close to the high concentration of schools in both
Khalifa City and the actual city. This, as well as the fact that the ministry
of presidential affairs is very close to the presidential palace, seems to
indicate that the government institutions that regulate other institutions
usually lie close to something relevant to their job (which is not always strictly
the case, since the ministry of culture is far from, for example, the National Theater
of Abu Dhabi (also known as the “Breakwater Theater,” to avoid confusing with
the National Theater) is quite far from where it is, despite being one of the
most active “official” performance venues in the emirate). I mentioned how
isolated areas like Khalifa City, Masdar City and Yas Island – which are all
typically spaces for high-income residents – are far from the Hamdan street
area where a lot of lower income immigrants live. I also mentioned how even further
apart (towards the Khalifa City area, but a bit more south) is Mussafah, Abu
Dhabi’s industrial area and a neighborhood of even lower income people.



Now that the contributions are there, just
something I wanted to comment on:
About Saadiyat: this island almost exists
in a different dimension from the rest of Abu Dhabi. The island is not only
physically separated from the city, but ideologically as well. While criticism
of the UAE’s highly successful government is still something that is not
mentioned, the fact that NYUAD is an American institution seems to allow for
the engagement of topics of study that involve topics which are usually banned
in most official institutions (sex, transgenderism, swearing, etc), which in
spaces like my school would be heavily scrutinized until it is made sure
nothing that could be offensive to the UAE’s culture was being stated. I rule
out the possibility of this being due to the fact that NYUAD is a higher
education institution, because for instance ACS (the American Community School)
also often goes “unfiltered” with things such as performances, as I’ve heard
there are performances that have been shown there involving swearing and
kissing (which in my school would be completely banned; we would have to resort
to simply alluding to these things). There is an unspoken rule about spaces
like NYUAD and ACS, but especially NYUAD as being places with their own set of
rules that do not conform fully to the general rules of Abu Dhabi. It is
interesting that such a place would exist in Saadiyat, a man-made island; a land
that was not supposed to be there. It will be interesting to see how the
development of the cultural district of Saadiyat takes shape: whether it will
look more like NYUAD or like the rest of the city.
There are two comments I have here. The first is how well you used the productive misunderstanding about the definition of performance. The second is about the clear segregation and isolation of certain forms of cultural expression in the UAE - how they are "allowed" in institutions that are transnational and western, but how those are not integrated into the city - and are not able to be accessed by many residents. So segregation happens not only geographically but institutionally. And yet, these expressive behaviors are not shut down althogether. They are just a privilege of certain transnational bodies. But someone like you passes between both sectors. And what happens where there are even more like you who have access to both locations?
ReplyDelete